Page views, logins, and document opens are the junk food of governance metrics. They feel productive and tell you nothing about whether the program is actually changing behavior.
The reason these metrics persist is that they are easy. Every portal ships with them out of the box. Real adoption metrics require instrumenting the workflow, which takes engineering effort that nobody budgeted for.
The three signals that actually matter
1. Completion of stewardship actions
Did the reviewer actually approve, reject, or escalate — or did the item sit in their queue for two weeks before timing out? Action completion is the closest proxy for engagement.
2. Time-to-decision on exceptions
Exceptions are where governance meets reality. A program with healthy exception cycle times is a program people trust. A program where exceptions disappear into a queue is a program people route around.
3. Downstream rework rate
If the artifacts coming out of your governance workflow still get reworked downstream, the program is decorative. Rework rate is the ultimate adoption metric because it measures whether the work product is trusted.
Instrument the workflow, not the portal. The portal is a means; the workflow is the outcome.